↓ Skip to main content

Intradialytic Laughter Yoga therapy for haemodialysis patients: a pre-post intervention feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
41 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
400 Mendeley
Title
Intradialytic Laughter Yoga therapy for haemodialysis patients: a pre-post intervention feasibility study
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12906-015-0705-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul N Bennett, Trisha Parsons, Ros Ben-Moshe, Merv Neal, Melissa K Weinberg, Karen Gilbert, Cherene Ockerby, Helen Rawson, Corinne Herbu, Alison M Hutchinson

Abstract

Laughter Yoga consists of physical exercise, relaxation techniques and simulated vigorous laughter. It has been associated with physical and psychological benefits for people in diverse clinical and non-clinical settings, but has not yet been tested in a haemodialysis setting. The study had three aims: 1) to examine the feasibility of conducting Laughter Yoga for patients with end stage kidney disease in a dialysis setting; 2) to explore the psychological and physiological impact of Laughter Yoga for these patients; and 3) to estimate the sample size required for future research. Pre/post intervention feasibility study. Eighteen participants were recruited into the study and Laughter Yoga therapists provided a four week intradialytic program (30-min intervention three times per week). Primary outcomes were psychological items measured at the first and last Laughter Yoga session, including: quality of life; subjective wellbeing; mood; optimism; control; self-esteem; depression, anxiety and stress. Secondary outcomes were: blood pressure, intradialytic hypotensive episodes and lung function (forced expiratory volume). Dialysis nurses exposed to the intervention completed a Laughter Yoga attitudes and perceptions survey (n = 11). Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics v22, including descriptive and inferential statistics, and sample size estimates were calculated using G*Power. One participant withdrew from the study for medical reasons that were unrelated to the study during the first week (94 % retention rate). There were non-significant increases in happiness, mood, and optimism and a decrease in stress. Episodes of intradialytic hypotension decreased from 19 pre and 19 during Laughter Yoga to 4 post Laughter Yoga. There was no change in lung function or blood pressure. All nurses agreed or strongly agreed that Laughter Yoga had a positive impact on patients' mood, it was a feasible intervention and they would recommend Laughter Yoga to their patients. Sample size calculations for future research indicated that a minimum of 207 participants would be required to provide sufficient power to detect change in key psychological variables. This study provides evidence that Laughter Yoga is a safe, low-intensity form of intradialytic physical activity that can be successfully implemented for patients in dialysis settings. Larger studies are required, however, to determine the effect of Laughter Yoga on key psychological variables. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry - ACTRN12614001130651 . Registered 23 October 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 400 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
Unknown 399 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 72 18%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 8%
Researcher 28 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 66 17%
Unknown 129 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 80 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 63 16%
Psychology 53 13%
Sports and Recreations 17 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 3%
Other 44 11%
Unknown 133 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2019.
All research outputs
#438,302
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#58
of 3,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,350
of 266,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.