↓ Skip to main content

Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q)
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Rejas, Miguel A Ruiz, Antonio Pardo, Javier Soto

Abstract

A previous study has documented the reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) in exploring patient satisfaction with medicines for chronic health conditions in routine medical practice, but the minimally important difference (MID) of this tool is as yet unknown. The objective of this research was to estimate the MID for the SATMED-Q total score and six constituent domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 46%
Psychology 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#13,356,164
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,275
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,514
of 139,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.