↓ Skip to main content

Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Minimally important difference of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q)
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-142
Pubmed ID
Authors

Javier Rejas, Miguel A Ruiz, Antonio Pardo, Javier Soto

Abstract

A previous study has documented the reliability and validity of the Treatment Satisfaction with Medicines Questionnaire (SATMED-Q) in exploring patient satisfaction with medicines for chronic health conditions in routine medical practice, but the minimally important difference (MID) of this tool is as yet unknown. The objective of this research was to estimate the MID for the SATMED-Q total score and six constituent domains.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 29%
Student > Master 3 21%
Other 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Lecturer 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 64%
Psychology 2 14%
Unknown 3 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#1,529,410
of 3,631,090 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#219
of 487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,436
of 66,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,631,090 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 55th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 487 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.