↓ Skip to main content

Anti-Neuroinflammatory effects of the extract of Achillea fragrantissima

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Anti-Neuroinflammatory effects of the extract of Achillea fragrantissima
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-11-98
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anat Elmann, Sharon Mordechay, Hilla Erlank, Alona Telerman, Miriam Rindner, Rivka Ofir

Abstract

The neuroinflammatory process plays a central role in the initiation and progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's and Alzheimer's diseases, and involves the activation of brain microglial cells. During the neuroinflammatory process, microglial cells release proinflammatory mediators such as cytokines, matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO). In the present study, extracts from 66 different desert plants were tested for their effect on lipopolysaccharide (LPS) - induced production of NO by primary microglial cells. The extract of Achillea fragrantissima (Af), which is a desert plant that has been used for many years in traditional medicine for the treatment of various diseases, was the most efficient extract, and was further studied for additional anti-neuroinflammatory effects in these cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 18%
Student > Master 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Researcher 6 10%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 15 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 12 20%
Unknown 19 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,673,262
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#487
of 3,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,676
of 152,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#16
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 152,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.