RT @dsquintana: Every summer I teach myself a new tool and apply it in a paper: 2016: Effect size distributions https://t.co/Lgt5tRVYUw 20…
2020: If studies in a research field are sufficiently powered to reliably detect (or reject) a wide range of effect sizes https://t.co/s2NyzgAPjp 2021: Auxiliary assumptions https://t.co/huhpNqNijX 2022: Clue: 🔥🔥🔥
@tcarpenter216 @camjpatrick @john_t_ormerod Perhaps this level of description would be relevant where. This paper gives a basic breakdown of bayes concepts in relation to NHST, which might help your people grasp it faster https://t.co/QBHp6imczi
First some background: For the past few years I've given myself a (northern hemisphere) summer project, in which I immerse myself in a new method or approach and then write a sole author paper about it https://t.co/2n9jR1ElbI
@SamueleMarcora The Bayes factor does specifically that by definition, along with heuristic statements as thresholds (though these are not strictly ‘recommended’ by statisticians, they are useful for practitioners to follow), plus it’s supported as a valid
@pabstalexandria @icymi_r @rstatstweet Thanks! You might also find this paper on Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests to be useful as well https://t.co/gPzgTBGcvm https://t.co/NT8B7orNxY
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @jacksonfyfe: An important reminder that no statistically significant (p > 0.05) differences between groups does not mean the groups are…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
An important reminder that no statistically significant (p > 0.05) differences between groups does not mean the groups are equivalent! I only learned this from the brilliant MOOC by @lakens - can’t recommend it highly enough! 👏👇 https://t.co/vOZgGSoTF3
Great post and threat on "same same or different?"
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @patilindrajeets: For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesia…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @patilindrajeets: For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesia…
RT @patilindrajeets: For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesia…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @patilindrajeets: For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesia…
RT @patilindrajeets: For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesia…
Every damn day.
RT @patilindrajeets: For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesia…
For this reason, all ggstatsplot plots by default show results from both Frequentist p-values and results from Bayesian hypothesis testing! 🙌 https://t.co/KSvN9H54VJ #RStats https://t.co/tePFn7R2H1
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
I've seen equivalence testing being used more often in my own sphere of research. It could be highly useful when evaluating group-level or longitudinal invariance and (non)-differential item functioning, both of which are ideal for comparisons across group
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
ditto! case example from our group - https://t.co/JgqQ80sX7F @shannon_grogans @gloria_hc_kim @JuyoenHur @kuhnmanu
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
This is the thing I see the most when I review papers in linguistics.
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
Yep, this is the weed that keeps popping up.
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…
RT @dsquintana: Reviewing *another* paper that claims measures from two groups are equivalent, as p >.05. You can't do this, no matter how…