| Title |
BMC Ecology Image Competition 2015: the winning images
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12898-015-0053-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine J Potenski, Ana Luz Porzecanski, Michel Baguette, Jean Clobert, David Hughes, Josef Settele |
| Abstract |
For the third time, BMC Ecology is delighted to announce the winners of our Image Competition. This year featured entries from all over the world and showcased not only the creativity and talent of the participants, but also the exquisite beauty and diversity of our planet. We are pleased to present the winning selections of the editorial board of the journal and guest judge Dr. Ana Luz Porzecanski, as well as some highly commended images that are sure to impress. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 12 | 24% |
| Australia | 5 | 10% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Kenya | 2 | 4% |
| Japan | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 66% |
| Scientists | 10 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
| Engineering | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#557,238
of 25,736,439 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#114
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,226
of 276,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,736,439 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,127 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.