| Title |
A rapid and versatile combined DNA/RNA extraction protocol and its application to the analysis of a novel DNA marker set polymorphic between Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes Col-0 and Landsberg erecta
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-1-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenneth Berendzen, Iain Searle, Dean Ravenscroft, Csaba Koncz, Alfred Batschauer, George Coupland, Imre E Somssich, Bekir Ülker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 33% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 3% |
| Unknown | 273 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 73 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 49 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 193 | 65% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 14% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 1% |
| Unspecified | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 3% |
| Unknown | 43 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,563,090
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#745
of 1,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,656
of 70,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,284 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 70,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.