↓ Skip to main content

Development of a heart failure filter for Medline: an objective approach using evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as an alternative to hand searching

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Development of a heart failure filter for Medline: an objective approach using evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as an alternative to hand searching
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-12
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raechel A Damarell, Jennifer Tieman, Ruth M Sladek, Patricia M Davidson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 8%
Spain 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 32 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Student > Postgraduate 5 13%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 3 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 53%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 13%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Computer Science 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 5 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,398,227
of 12,373,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#571
of 1,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,129
of 248,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,373,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them