↓ Skip to main content

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
47 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeppe B Schroll, Rasmus Moustgaard, Peter C Gøtzsche

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 47 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 19%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 4 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 11%
Mathematics 5 11%
Psychology 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 8 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#8,513,604
of 14,143,289 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#886
of 1,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,984
of 284,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#47
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,143,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,231 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.