↓ Skip to main content

Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
146 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Dealing with substantial heterogeneity in Cochrane reviews. Cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, February 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-11-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeppe B Schroll, Rasmus Moustgaard, Peter C Gøtzsche

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 113 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 13%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 26 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 28 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Mathematics 6 5%
Other 24 21%
Unknown 33 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2019.
All research outputs
#15,349,419
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,508
of 2,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,754
of 106,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#16
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,013 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 106,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.