RT @Abraham_RMI: How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer Via @BMCMedicine @BioMedCentral https://t.co…
RT @Abraham_RMI: How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer Via @BMCMedicine @BioMedCentral https://t.co…
How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer Via @BMCMedicine @BioMedCentral https://t.co/MH6VDjIaXR
RT @ColorectalDis: #Statistics in the editorial process: WHEN? Recognising statistical problems can be difficult for a non-statistician (…
RT @ColorectalDis: #Statistics in the editorial process: WHEN? Recognising statistical problems can be difficult for a non-statistician (…
RT @ColorectalDis: #Statistics in the editorial process: WHEN? Recognising statistical problems can be difficult for a non-statistician (…
#Statistics in the editorial process: WHEN? Recognising statistical problems can be difficult for a non-statistician (and even for statisticians!)🤔🤯 Tips to spot problems are available: https://t.co/AvhubEEK3D But if in doubt, consult a statistical revie
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
This is really helpful if you peer review articles but are not a statistics expert.
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @FarrugiaCher: Great article for anyone reviewing or conducting #clinicalstudies on @BMCMedicine! https://t.co/onQWHWf2Uc
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
RT @beagoulao: I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unf…
I appreciate the good intentions of this paper, but some of the Q included in this checklist are complex & professionals unfamiliar w stats would prob struggle. Why not have a statistical expert as 1 of the reviewers? Thoughts #statstwitter #epitwitter
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @FarrugiaCher: Great article for anyone reviewing or conducting #clinicalstudies on @BMCMedicine! https://t.co/onQWHWf2Uc
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
Great article for anyone reviewing or conducting #clinicalstudies on @BMCMedicine!
RT @Dr2NisreenAlwan: Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @Dr2NisreenAlwan: Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @Dr2NisreenAlwan: Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @PhDProf1: Excellent recommendations. Many journals explicitly ask whether review by a statistician is required, so do say 'yes' when c…
RT @AlannaSincovich: Great summary article for subject (non-statistical) reviewers - how to spot a problem and when to recommend expert sta…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @PhDProf1: Excellent recommendations. Many journals explicitly ask whether review by a statistician is required, so do say 'yes' when c…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @Dr2NisreenAlwan: Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
Helpful guidelines for peer review
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
Excellent recommendations. Many journals explicitly ask whether review by a statistician is required, so do say 'yes' when circumstances suggest this would be wise.
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
RT @DrSarahEJackson: Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sci…
Useful guide to spotting statistical problems as a peer reviewer. #academictwitter #academicchatter #peerreview #sciencetwitter #phdchat
RT @Dr2NisreenAlwan: Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
RT @Dr2NisreenAlwan: Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
Advice from Darren is always worth reading. It got me through my PhD :) #EpiTwitter https://t.co/BIFvxcp1NA
RT @helen_badge: How to spot a statistical problem: advice also relevant for health managers and anyone interested in using evidence to del…
RT @AlannaSincovich: Great summary article for subject (non-statistical) reviewers - how to spot a problem and when to recommend expert sta…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
Quick tip for a reviewer: just watch out for these 3 points. https://t.co/ThFC9TaNZb
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @helen_badge: How to spot a statistical problem: advice also relevant for health managers and anyone interested in using evidence to del…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
How to spot a statistical problem: advice also relevant for health managers and anyone interested in using evidence to deliver or improve health services @nswaci https://t.co/uEqZJwTgtu @BioMedCentral @pash22
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @AlannaSincovich: Great summary article for subject (non-statistical) reviewers - how to spot a problem and when to recommend expert sta…
RT @AlannaSincovich: Great summary article for subject (non-statistical) reviewers - how to spot a problem and when to recommend expert sta…
Great summary article for subject (non-statistical) reviewers - how to spot a problem and when to recommend expert statistical review #AcademicTwitter https://t.co/58fI0li9bv
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @Abdallah81MD: How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer | BMC Medicine https://t.co/ZCxlrjPoFx
How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer | BMC Medicine https://t.co/ZCxlrjPoFx
RT @pash22: How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer https://t.co/7DaiwTubvX
One should read this. Several times. Journal club it with one’s students. Every year. And remember it, of course, when doing one’s daily work. Thanks. How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer | BMC Medicine | Full Text http
RT @pash22: How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer https://t.co/7DaiwTubvX
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
How to spot a statistical problem: advice for a non-statistical reviewer https://t.co/7DaiwTubvX
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
RT @cecilejanssens: How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co…
How to spot if researchers know what they are doing? About transparency, completeness, and justification. https://t.co/yKAqZ2SJUN https://t.co/kJ0BpyoDSq
RT @moorejh: How to spot a statistical problem during peer review https://t.co/rUoE5xKwkQ HT @sab_ra #datascience #research #scichat
if u hav trouble understanding "indicators ... more common problems encountered in primary research", u should ask for stat advice? Methinks https://t.co/U1z1wqUWgd
RT @moorejh: How to spot a statistical problem during peer review https://t.co/rUoE5xKwkQ HT @sab_ra #datascience #research #scichat