↓ Skip to main content

Development and psychometric testing of an instrument to evaluate cognitive skills of evidence based practice in student health professionals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
Title
Development and psychometric testing of an instrument to evaluate cognitive skills of evidence based practice in student health professionals
Published in
BMC Medical Education, October 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-11-78
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy K Lewis, Marie T Williams, Timothy S Olds

Abstract

Health educators need rigorously developed instruments to evaluate cognitive skills relating to evidence based practice (EBP). Previous EBP evaluation instruments have focused on the acquisition and appraisal of the evidence and are largely based in the medical profession. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an EBP evaluation instrument to assess EBP cognitive skills for entry-level health professional disciplines.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Canada 2 1%
United Kingdom 2 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 148 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 20 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 11%
Professor 15 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 9%
Other 55 34%
Unknown 16 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 22%
Social Sciences 16 10%
Psychology 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 23 14%
Unknown 24 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2014.
All research outputs
#1,641,399
of 15,410,417 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#287
of 2,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,284
of 214,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#7
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,410,417 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,196 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.