↓ Skip to main content

Using surveillance data to estimate pandemic vaccine effectiveness against laboratory confirmed influenza A(H1N1)2009 infection: two case-control studies, Spain, season 2009-2010

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
Title
Using surveillance data to estimate pandemic vaccine effectiveness against laboratory confirmed influenza A(H1N1)2009 infection: two case-control studies, Spain, season 2009-2010
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-899
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camelia Savulescu, Silvia Jiménez-Jorge, Salvador de Mateo, Francisco Pozo, Inmaculada Casas, Pilar Pérez Breña, Antonia Galmés, Juana M Vanrell, Carolina Rodriguez, Tomas Vega, Ana Martinez, Nuria Torner, Julián M Ramos, Maria C Serrano, Jesús Castilla, Manuel García Cenoz, Jone M Altzibar, Jose M Arteagoitia, Carmen Quiñones, Milagros Perucha, Amparo Larrauri

Abstract

Physicians of the Spanish Influenza Sentinel Surveillance System report and systematically swab patients attended to their practices for influenza-like illness (ILI). Within the surveillance system, some Spanish regions also participated in an observational study aiming at estimating influenza vaccine effectiveness (cycEVA study). During the season 2009-2010, we estimated pandemic influenza vaccine effectiveness using both the influenza surveillance data and the cycEVA study.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Researcher 9 19%
Student > Master 9 19%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 33%
Unspecified 11 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 19%
Psychology 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2012.
All research outputs
#1,380,998
of 12,372,633 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,687
of 8,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,108
of 216,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#88
of 669 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,633 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 669 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.