| Title |
Factors affecting the use of maternal health services in Madhya Pradesh state of India: a multilevel analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal for Equity in Health, December 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-9276-10-59 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tej Ram Jat, Nawi Ng, Miguel San Sebastian |
| Abstract |
Improving maternal health is one of the eight Millennium Development Goals. It is widely accepted that the use of maternal health services helps in reducing maternal morbidity and mortality. The utilization of maternal health services is a complex phenomenon and it is influenced by several factors. Therefore, the factors at different levels affecting the use of these services need to be clearly understood. The objective of this study was to estimate the effects of individual, community and district level characteristics on the utilisation of maternal health services with special reference to antenatal care (ANC), skilled attendance at delivery and postnatal care (PNC). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 372 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 2 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 363 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 77 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 13% |
| Researcher | 40 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 59 | 16% |
| Unknown | 85 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 94 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 75 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 19 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 99 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#6,997,872
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#1,110
of 2,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,768
of 246,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,222 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.