Title |
Early functional results after Hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture: a randomized comparison between a minimal invasive and a conventional approach
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, August 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-141 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Felix Renken, Svenja Renken, Andreas Paech, Michael Wenzl, Andreas Unger, Arndt P Schulz |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 120 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 17% |
Student > Master | 13 | 11% |
Researcher | 10 | 8% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
Other | 22 | 18% |
Unknown | 39 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 41% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 12% |
Psychology | 4 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 5% |
Unknown | 41 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#4,181,070
of 22,835,198 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#832
of 4,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,239
of 166,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#10
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,835,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.