↓ Skip to main content

Deep mitochondrial divergence within a Heliconiusbutterfly species is not explained by cryptic speciation or endosymbiotic bacteria

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
Title
Deep mitochondrial divergence within a Heliconiusbutterfly species is not explained by cryptic speciation or endosymbiotic bacteria
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-11-358
Pubmed ID
Authors

Astrid G Muñoz, Simon W Baxter, Mauricio Linares, Chris D Jiggins

Abstract

Cryptic population structure can be an indicator of incipient speciation or historical processes. We investigated a previously documented deep break in the mitochondrial haplotypes of Heliconius erato chestertonii to explore the possibility of cryptic speciation, and also the possible presence of endosymbiont bacteria that might drive mitochondrial population structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
India 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Tunisia 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 71 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 27%
Researcher 14 17%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 4 5%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 68%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 11%
Unspecified 4 5%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 9 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2011.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#3,511
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#227,885
of 248,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#42
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.