↓ Skip to main content

Reliability of capturing foot parameters using digital scanning and the neutral suspension casting technique

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
66 Mendeley
Title
Reliability of capturing foot parameters using digital scanning and the neutral suspension casting technique
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1757-1146-4-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Carroll, Mary-Ellen Annabell, Keith Rome

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 65 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 22 33%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 12%
Researcher 7 11%
Unspecified 6 9%
Other 15 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 21%
Engineering 13 20%
Unspecified 8 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Other 7 11%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,187,088
of 13,571,692 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#387
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,482
of 360,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#62
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,571,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.