↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 tweeters
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1119 Mendeley
Title
Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach
Published in
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1743-0003-8-66
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juan-Manuel Belda-Lois, Silvia Mena-del Horno, Ignacio Bermejo-Bosch, Juan C Moreno, José L Pons, Dario Farina, Marco Iosa, Marco Molinari, Federica Tamburella, Ander Ramos, Andrea Caria, Teodoro Solis-Escalante, Clemens Brunner, Massimiliano Rea

Abstract

This document provides a review of the techniques and therapies used in gait rehabilitation after stroke. It also examines the possible benefits of including assistive robotic devices and brain-computer interfaces in this field, according to a top-down approach, in which rehabilitation is driven by neural plasticity.The methods reviewed comprise classical gait rehabilitation techniques (neurophysiological and motor learning approaches), functional electrical stimulation (FES), robotic devices, and brain-computer interfaces (BCI).From the analysis of these approaches, we can draw the following conclusions. Regarding classical rehabilitation techniques, there is insufficient evidence to state that a particular approach is more effective in promoting gait recovery than other. Combination of different rehabilitation strategies seems to be more effective than over-ground gait training alone. Robotic devices need further research to show their suitability for walking training and their effects on over-ground gait. The use of FES combined with different walking retraining strategies has shown to result in improvements in hemiplegic gait. Reports on non-invasive BCIs for stroke recovery are limited to the rehabilitation of upper limbs; however, some works suggest that there might be a common mechanism which influences upper and lower limb recovery simultaneously, independently of the limb chosen for the rehabilitation therapy. Functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) enables researchers to detect signals from specific regions of the cortex during performance of motor activities for the development of future BCIs. Future research would make possible to analyze the impact of rehabilitation on brain plasticity, in order to adapt treatment resources to meet the needs of each patient and to optimize the recovery process.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
Germany 4 <1%
India 4 <1%
Switzerland 3 <1%
Italy 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Other 18 2%
Unknown 1072 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 200 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 194 17%
Student > Bachelor 157 14%
Researcher 102 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 7%
Other 227 20%
Unknown 160 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 316 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 204 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 126 11%
Neuroscience 87 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 4%
Other 145 13%
Unknown 195 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,314,866
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#106
of 1,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,985
of 180,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,276 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,269 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.