↓ Skip to main content

Toothbrushing: to the best of one’s abilities is possibly not good enough

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Oral Health, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Toothbrushing: to the best of one’s abilities is possibly not good enough
Published in
BMC Oral Health, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12903-018-0633-0
Authors

Renate Deinzer, Stefanie Ebel, Helen Blättermann, Ulrike Weik, Jutta Margraf-Stiksrud

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 36%
Unspecified 3 27%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 18%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 55%
Unspecified 3 27%
Engineering 2 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,736,335
of 12,829,119 outputs
Outputs from BMC Oral Health
#312
of 639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,282
of 304,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Oral Health
#51
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,829,119 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 639 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.