↓ Skip to main content

Basing care reforms on evidence: The Kenya health sector costing model

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Basing care reforms on evidence: The Kenya health sector costing model
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, May 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-128
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steffen Flessa, Michael Moeller, Tim Ensor, Klaus Hornetz

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 91 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 27%
Student > Master 22 23%
Unspecified 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 26 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 28%
Social Sciences 15 16%
Business, Management and Accounting 12 13%
Unspecified 11 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Other 21 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,074,024
of 13,599,972 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,034
of 4,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,784
of 309,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#442
of 727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,599,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,553 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 309,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.