↓ Skip to main content

Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the integration of biomedical and herbal medicine units in Ghana using the WHO Health Systems Framework: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
128 Mendeley
Title
Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the integration of biomedical and herbal medicine units in Ghana using the WHO Health Systems Framework: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12906-018-2334-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Appiah, Isaac Kingsley Amponsah, Anubhuti Poudyal, Merlin Lincoln Kwao Mensah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 128 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 18%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 7 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 26 20%
Unknown 42 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 13%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 6%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 22 17%
Unknown 46 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#15,021,759
of 23,108,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,853
of 3,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#206,914
of 349,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#36
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,108,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.