↓ Skip to main content

Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the integration of biomedical and herbal medicine units in Ghana using the WHO Health Systems Framework: a qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, October 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Identifying strengths and weaknesses of the integration of biomedical and herbal medicine units in Ghana using the WHO Health Systems Framework: a qualitative study
Published in
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, October 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12906-018-2334-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Appiah, Isaac Kingsley Amponsah, Anubhuti Poudyal, Merlin Lincoln Kwao Mensah

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 26%
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Unspecified 4 21%
Lecturer 2 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 16%
Social Sciences 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2018.
All research outputs
#8,051,063
of 12,834,493 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#1,430
of 2,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,024
of 302,308 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
#112
of 262 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,834,493 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,308 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 262 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.