↓ Skip to main content

Adaptive designs in clinical trials: from scientific advice to marketing authorisation to the European Medicine Agency

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Adaptive designs in clinical trials: from scientific advice to marketing authorisation to the European Medicine Agency
Published in
Trials, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-3012-x
Authors

Olivier Collignon, Franz Koenig, Armin Koch, Robert James Hemmings, Frank Pétavy, Agnès Saint-Raymond, Marisa Papaluca-Amati, Martin Posch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 43%
Other 3 21%
Unspecified 2 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 7%
Other 1 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 21%
Unspecified 3 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 14%
Decision Sciences 1 7%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,908,854
of 13,439,767 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#771
of 3,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,924
of 341,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#159
of 514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,439,767 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.