↓ Skip to main content

Decisional conflict of physicians during the decision-making process for a simulated advanced-stage cancer patient: an international longitudinal study with German and Belgian physicians

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Decisional conflict of physicians during the decision-making process for a simulated advanced-stage cancer patient: an international longitudinal study with German and Belgian physicians
Published in
BMC Cancer, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12885-018-5071-5
Authors

Catharina Schoenfeld, Yves Libert, Heribert Sattel, Delphine Canivet, France Delevallez, Andreas Dinkel, Pascal O. Berberat, Alexander Wuensch, Darius Razavi

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Unknown 4 67%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2018.
All research outputs
#8,713,432
of 13,906,652 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,559
of 5,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,804
of 366,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#302
of 722 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,906,652 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,312 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,438 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 722 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.