↓ Skip to main content

A core outcome set for clinical trials in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): a study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
A core outcome set for clinical trials in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): a study protocol
Published in
Trials, November 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-3019-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annick Maujean, Linda Carroll, Michele Curatolo, James Elliott, Helge Kasch, David Walton, Michele Sterling

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 24%
Student > Bachelor 2 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Other 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 6 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Other 3 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2018.
All research outputs
#9,944,475
of 12,996,276 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#2,520
of 3,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#222,005
of 318,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#439
of 508 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,996,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,217 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 508 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.