↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of stability of directly standardized rates for sparse data using simulation methods

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of stability of directly standardized rates for sparse data using simulation methods
Published in
Population Health Metrics, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12963-018-0177-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joan K. Morris, Joachim Tan, Paul Fryers, Jonathan Bestwick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 33%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 6 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 33%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,204,116
of 25,107,281 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#81
of 410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,274
of 448,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,107,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them