↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of stability of directly standardized rates for sparse data using simulation methods

Overview of attention for article published in Population Health Metrics, December 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of stability of directly standardized rates for sparse data using simulation methods
Published in
Population Health Metrics, December 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12963-018-0177-1
Authors

Joan K. Morris, Joachim Tan, Paul Fryers, Jonathan Bestwick

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Librarian 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Unspecified 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 50%
Unspecified 1 25%
Design 1 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,996,324
of 13,116,247 outputs
Outputs from Population Health Metrics
#75
of 288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,231
of 320,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Health Metrics
#13
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,116,247 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.