Title |
Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy – functional improvement following subthreshold nanopulse laser treatment: a case report
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Medical Case Reports, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13256-018-1935-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrea Cusumano, Benedetto Falsini, Emiliano Giardina, Raffaella Cascella, Jacopo Sebastiani, John Marshall |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Student > Master | 1 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Linguistics | 1 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,557,299
of 23,122,481 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#1,529
of 3,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,317
of 437,984 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#25
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,122,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,972 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,984 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.