↓ Skip to main content

The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
13 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
The impact of repeated vaccination on influenza vaccine effectiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-018-1239-8
Authors

Lauren C. Ramsay, Sarah A. Buchan, Robert G. Stirling, Benjamin J. Cowling, Shuo Feng, Jeffrey C. Kwong, Bryna F. Warshawsky

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 27%
Unspecified 19 24%
Student > Master 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 38%
Unspecified 26 33%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 10 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2019.
All research outputs
#899,160
of 13,516,331 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#731
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,290
of 339,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#96
of 238 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,516,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 238 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.