Title |
INTERACT: A comprehensive approach to assess urban form interventions through natural experiments
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6339-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yan Kestens, Meghan Winters, Daniel Fuller, Scott Bell, Janelle Berscheid, Ruben Brondeel, Michael Cantinotti, Geetanjali Datta, Lise Gauvin, Margot Gough, Karen Laberee, Paul Lewis, Sébastien Lord, Hui ( Henry) Luan, Heather McKay, Catherine Morency, Nazeem Muhajarine, Trisalyn Nelson, Callista Ottoni, Zoe Poirier Stephens, Caitlin Pugh, Gabrielle Rancourt, Martin Shareck, Joanie Sims-Gould, Meridith Sones, Kevin Stanley, Benoit Thierry, Calvin Thigpen, Rania Wasfi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 9 | 39% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
United States | 2 | 9% |
Luxembourg | 1 | 4% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 4% |
Ireland | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 6 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
Scientists | 9 | 39% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 14% |
Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 21 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 7% |
Other | 41 | 17% |
Unknown | 65 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 40 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 6% |
Computer Science | 14 | 6% |
Engineering | 12 | 5% |
Other | 56 | 23% |
Unknown | 82 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,528,899
of 24,546,092 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,678
of 16,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,018
of 446,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#42
of 301 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,546,092 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,210 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 301 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.