↓ Skip to main content

Guided meditation as an adjunct to enhance postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled feasibility trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
Title
Guided meditation as an adjunct to enhance postoperative recovery after cardiac surgery: study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled feasibility trial
Published in
Trials, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13063-018-3103-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Senthil Packiasabapathy, Ammu T. Susheela, Ariel Mueller, Melissa Patxot, Doris-Vanessa Gasangwa, Brian O’Gara, Shahzad Shaefi, Edward R. Marcantonio, Gloria Y. Yeh, Balachundhar Subramaniam

Timeline
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 174 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 24 14%
Student > Bachelor 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 14 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 59 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 14%
Psychology 19 11%
Neuroscience 7 4%
Engineering 3 2%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 61 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2019.
All research outputs
#4,770,584
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#557
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,784
of 449,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them