Title |
Protocol: a rapid and economical procedure for purification of plasmid or plant DNA with diverse applications in plant biology
|
---|---|
Published in |
Plant Methods, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1746-4811-6-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jian-Feng Li, Li, Jen Sheen |
Abstract |
Research in plant molecular biology involves DNA purification on a daily basis. Although different commercial kits enable convenient extraction of high-quality DNA from E. coli cells, PCR and agarose gel samples as well as plant tissues, each kit is designed for a particular type of DNA extraction work, and the cost of purchasing these kits over a long run can be considerable. Furthermore, a simple method for the isolation of binary plasmid from Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells with satisfactory yield is lacking. Here we describe an easy protocol using homemade silicon dioxide matrix and seven simple solutions for DNA extraction from E. coli and A. tumefaciens cells, PCR and restriction digests, agarose gel slices, and plant tissues. Compared with the commercial kits, this protocol allows rapid DNA purification from diverse sources with comparable yield and purity at negligible cost. Following this protocol, we have demonstrated: (1) DNA fragments as small as a MYC-epitope tag coding sequence can be successfully recovered from an agarose gel slice; (2) Miniprep DNA from E. coli can be eluted with as little as 5 mul water, leading to high DNA concentrations (>1 mug/mul) for efficient biolistic bombardment of Arabidopsis seedlings, polyethylene glycol (PEG)-mediated Arabidopsis protoplast transfection and maize protoplast electroporation; (3) Binary plasmid DNA prepared from A. tumefaciens is suitable for verification by restriction analysis without the need for large scale propagation; (4) High-quality genomic DNA is readily isolated from several plant species including Arabidopsis, tobacco and maize. Thus, the silicon dioxide matrix-based DNA purification protocol offers an easy, efficient and economical way to extract DNA for various purposes in plant research. |
Twitter Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 2 | 20% |
Australia | 1 | 10% |
China | 1 | 10% |
Ecuador | 1 | 10% |
United States | 1 | 10% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | 10% |
Canada | 1 | 10% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 4 | 1% |
United States | 4 | 1% |
Brazil | 4 | 1% |
France | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Argentina | 2 | <1% |
Kenya | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Austria | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 2% |
Unknown | 352 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 95 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 22% |
Student > Master | 48 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 34 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 17 | 4% |
Other | 62 | 16% |
Unknown | 42 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 232 | 61% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 53 | 14% |
Engineering | 11 | 3% |
Chemistry | 7 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
Other | 20 | 5% |
Unknown | 51 | 13% |