Title |
The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018
|
---|---|
Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, February 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40900-019-0138-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Iain Chalmers, Patricia Atkinson, Douglas Badenoch, Paul Glasziou, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Andy Oxman, Mike Clarke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 264 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 116 | 44% |
United States | 17 | 6% |
Canada | 12 | 5% |
Ireland | 8 | 3% |
Australia | 8 | 3% |
Sweden | 6 | 2% |
Germany | 6 | 2% |
Spain | 4 | 2% |
Italy | 4 | 2% |
Other | 17 | 6% |
Unknown | 66 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 160 | 61% |
Scientists | 59 | 22% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 29% |
Unspecified | 4 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 10% |
Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 19% |
Unknown | 3 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 24% |
Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 24% |
Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 153. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2021.
All research outputs
#271,482
of 25,595,500 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#6
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,015
of 448,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,595,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.