↓ Skip to main content

The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 165)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
298 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
The James Lind Initiative: books, websites and databases to promote critical thinking about treatment claims, 2003 to 2018
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s40900-019-0138-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Iain Chalmers, Patricia Atkinson, Douglas Badenoch, Paul Glasziou, Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren, Andy Oxman, Mike Clarke

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 298 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 38%
Student > Bachelor 2 25%
Student > Master 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Psychology 2 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Environmental Science 1 13%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 176. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
#83,064
of 14,014,089 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#2
of 165 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,119
of 316,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,014,089 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 165 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them