↓ Skip to main content

Applications of the reflective practice questionnaire in medical education

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
Title
Applications of the reflective practice questionnaire in medical education
Published in
BMC Medical Education, February 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1481-6
Authors

Shane L. Rogers, Lynn E. Priddis, Nicole Michels, Michael Tieman, Lon J. Van Winkle

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 21 38%
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 5%
Other 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 22 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 36%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 4 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#7,205,120
of 13,337,884 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,006
of 1,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,449
of 286,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,337,884 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them