| Title |
Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-8-45 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Thomas, Angela Harden |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 90 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 29 | 32% |
| Ireland | 9 | 10% |
| Canada | 8 | 9% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Chile | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Guyana | 1 | 1% |
| Poland | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 30 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 42 | 47% |
| Scientists | 33 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5,964 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 50 | <1% |
| United States | 14 | <1% |
| Canada | 9 | <1% |
| South Africa | 7 | <1% |
| Spain | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 5 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | <1% |
| Unknown | 5833 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1112 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1016 | 17% |
| Researcher | 496 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 480 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 400 | 7% |
| Other | 1013 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1447 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 911 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 753 | 13% |
| Psychology | 611 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 592 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 417 | 7% |
| Other | 1061 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1619 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 102. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2024.
All research outputs
#420,064
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#33
of 2,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#737
of 98,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,318 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them