| Title |
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-4-27 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Linda C Li, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Camilla Nielsen, Maria Judd, Peter C Coyte, Ian D Graham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 4 | 29% |
| Chile | 3 | 21% |
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 71% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 413 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 2% |
| Canada | 6 | 1% |
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 387 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 68 | 16% |
| Researcher | 66 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 58 | 14% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 104 | 25% |
| Unknown | 66 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 74 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 41 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 8% |
| Psychology | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 71 | 17% |
| Unknown | 79 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,897,714
of 24,884,310 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#599
of 1,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,792
of 98,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,884,310 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,788 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.