↓ Skip to main content

Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
Title
Use of communities of practice in business and health care sectors: A systematic review
Published in
Implementation Science, May 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-27
Authors

Linda C Li, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Camilla Nielsen, Maria Judd, Peter C Coyte, Ian D Graham

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 8 3%
Canada 6 2%
United States 5 2%
South Africa 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 230 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 52 20%
Researcher 46 18%
Student > Master 42 16%
Professor > Associate Professor 21 8%
Other 18 7%
Other 79 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 70 27%
Social Sciences 62 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 26 10%
Unspecified 24 9%
Computer Science 19 7%
Other 57 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,178,815
of 13,444,619 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#389
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,803
of 212,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,444,619 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.