↓ Skip to main content

Herd immunity alters the conditions for performing dose schedule comparisons: an individual-based model of pneumococcal carriage

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Herd immunity alters the conditions for performing dose schedule comparisons: an individual-based model of pneumococcal carriage
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12879-019-3833-6
Authors

Alan Yang, Francisco Cai, Marc Lipsitch

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 33%
Unspecified 3 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Master 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 5 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Mathematics 1 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2019.
All research outputs
#8,028,061
of 13,459,972 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,475
of 5,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#140,302
of 253,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,459,972 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,673 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.