RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
Even IF all that were true (& it's not lol), it's still a shitty study whose results have been disproven over & over.
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
Anyone telling a person with #MECFS to exercise should be locked up. For twice as long if you’re a doctor.
Never been discredited? Maybe in your Disney reality. I would use a mask all the time, cause covid can bite anyone…
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
what kind of a ghoul do you have to be to spend so much of your energy insisting on hurting one of the most beleaguered patient populations of all time
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
RT @Healthy_Control: "We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consi…
"We prefer the definitions of recovery we used to those used by Wilshire et al. as they give absolute rates more consistent....with our clinical experience" Changing the definitions of recovery mid-way through a trial to get the results you want is not sci
It's funny, because only people who have fights with the community defend the study's errors. All the scientists, scientific communicators who are not in the middle of this fight, who saw these problems, were scandalized. The text published is from the a
RT @Psycholoog_ME: If twisting reality is an art, give this man a prize! Defending the PACE trial, even by bashing others and calling that…
RT @ZacharyGrinDPT: Reminder for those unfamiliar…PACE trial was never discredited, it’s not retracted & no scientific misconduct has been…
RT @Silas33: Read the date, yes it’s 2024, not a historical tweet to show how ignorant some of the medical establishment were 20 years ago.…
RT @Silas33: Read the date, yes it’s 2024, not a historical tweet to show how ignorant some of the medical establishment were 20 years ago.…
RT @Silas33: Read the date, yes it’s 2024, not a historical tweet to show how ignorant some of the medical establishment were 20 years ago.…
If twisting reality is an art, give this man a prize! Defending the PACE trial, even by bashing others and calling that ´scientific debate´ 🤧
Reminder: 100 Scientists have called for Retraction of the PACE trial. PACE is now taught at IVY League school on "how not to conduct an RCT" - because a Prof would have trashed that proposal if a Bachelor's student wrote it. I bet you slept though resear
Reminder for those unfamiliar…PACE trial was never discredited, it’s not retracted & no scientific misconduct has been found. Some people didn’t like the results, did a poor job manipulating incomplete data & wrongly claim they “discredited” the s
@davidtuller1 A serious accusation that doesn’t seem justified… “To be considered recovered participants had to meet not one but five separate measures of recovery, including rating their overall health as “much better” or “very much better”.” https://t.c
@davidtuller1 @MECFSNews I was pointing out the HRA stated it’s not discredited, there were no regulatory concerns, and there was a high level of transparency. Here’s the author’s reply to the reanalysis in case anyone who comes across this would like to r
RT @deevybee: @OmidVEbrahimi @wi_john @OxPsychiatry I’d strongly recommend you call it something else to avoid confusion https://t.co/g645…
@OmidVEbrahimi @wi_john @OxPsychiatry I’d strongly recommend you call it something else to avoid confusion https://t.co/g645SiUKnc
@StuartJRitchie @stianwestlake Stian: “Over time, though, doctors came to accept that controlled trials were an important complement to their practice, rather than a threat to it.” And some learnt how to retrospectively re-design trials to try to confirm t
@AJansen118 @awgaffney I did actually. I find the criticism thay the outcomes are patient reported to be especially ridiculous, considering the entire disease and diagnosis is patient reported. You can't have it both ways. And the critcisms of CBT because
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
RT @resiapretorius: BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medica…
BUT the only way the treatments will become mainstream is if it is tested in RCTs. This is unfortunately how the medical fraternity decide on treatments. THIS is the reason why researchers with DATA and EVIDENCE should be CONSULTED during RCT planning.
Oh the RCT!! Well those are so reliable ...... There is the famous PACE Trial RCT of course .... https://t.co/Vj7gS7BKDH we all know that one was sooooo reliable!? @doctorfabrowski @resiapretorius @dbkell @rebslogan @JoanMcParland we need to adopt a simil
@TinyWriterLaura @AlexDesignsIt "you can't push yourself through an active illness" even though nobody is suggesting you do. You want to pin your whole negative view on not understanding issues & opinions of those that disliked it much they delibera
@Healthy_Control @MMissingHolland 'PACE trial was funded by the UK Medical Research Council (MRC G0200434), the Department of Health for England, the UK Department for Work and Pensions, and the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health Dire
@RunarSterdahl Takk for denne. For meg er dette en bekreftelse på at med den rette innstillingen så kan du finne feil i all statistikk og metode. Levin publiserte sin kritikk her; https://t.co/ewEvWQeCkX Mens Sharpe med flere svarte her; https://t.co/ELLV
@bendymarsh @profmsharpe @MatthewJDalby The articles you link to are not careful analyses of the data, just misleadìng attempts to discredit the research, this can be seen by reading the responses to them https://t.co/GuRcux3Aoc https://t.co/Tk2DC7L5QQ
@richardvallee @davidtuller1 @ssppeerroo @Healthy_Control @b_m_hughes @cochranecollab @C0PE @CochraneLibrary @NICEComms @Columbia My understanding is that there was only a null result on the 'original' primary outcomes after (claimed by Sharpe et al) overd
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
RT @wilshica: @GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial…
@GeorgeMonbiot do read this piece, it is very revealing. The PACE authors argue it is OK to switch outcomes on a major trial if you simply "prefer" the altered ones - because they fit better with your previous work and "clinical experience". Our reply: h
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @MECFSisCFSnotME: There is NO such thing as CFS. Its a heterogeneous group so clearly one treatment for a group of people with differen…
There is NO such thing as CFS. Its a heterogeneous group so clearly one treatment for a group of people with different illnesses with different causes is fuckin ridiculous. Not even diagnosed them with anything to know what treatment is best for them. CFS
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @lissascribbles: The PACE trial is a good example of the inflated ego of old white men refusing to believe that what they studied 40 yea…
RT @StripyLightCIC: The PACE trial is covered IN-DEPTH within our #etraining. #Healthcare professionals have commented that this part of o…
RT @cheshfr: Michael Sharpe. Still defending a trial where recovery outcomes overlapped with entry criteria, where outcomes showing no impr…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @lissascribbles: The PACE trial is a good example of the inflated ego of old white men refusing to believe that what they studied 40 yea…
RT @GeorgeMonbiot: If anyone is interested in the major problems with this paper, please see https://t.co/gCByQrTaoT Please also note that…
RT @lissascribbles: The PACE trial is a good example of the inflated ego of old white men refusing to believe that what they studied 40 yea…
RT @lissascribbles: The PACE trial is a good example of the inflated ego of old white men refusing to believe that what they studied 40 yea…
RT @lissascribbles: The PACE trial is a good example of the inflated ego of old white men refusing to believe that what they studied 40 yea…
RT @lissascribbles: The PACE trial is a good example of the inflated ego of old white men refusing to believe that what they studied 40 yea…