↓ Skip to main content

Uptake of evidence in policy development: the case of user fees for health care in public health facilities in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
Title
Uptake of evidence in policy development: the case of user fees for health care in public health facilities in Uganda
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s12913-014-0639-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Juliet Nabyonga-Orem, Freddie Ssengooba, Rhona Mijumbi, Christine Kirunga Tashobya, Bruno Marchal, Bart Criel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 113 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 28 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 23%
Social Sciences 22 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 30 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2016.
All research outputs
#18,443,697
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,481
of 7,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,284
of 353,624 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#107
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,624 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.