↓ Skip to main content

Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
19 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
241 Mendeley
Title
Lumbar segmental instability: a criterion-related validity study of manual therapy assessment
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-6-56
Pubmed ID
Authors

J Haxby Abbott, Brendan McCane, Peter Herbison, Graeme Moginie, Cathy Chapple, Tracy Hogarty

Abstract

Musculoskeletal physiotherapists routinely assess lumbar segmental motion during the clinical examination of a patient with low back pain. The validity of manual assessment of segmental motion has not, however, been adequately investigated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 241 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
New Zealand 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 225 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 20%
Other 36 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 26 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 10%
Student > Postgraduate 23 10%
Other 72 30%
Unknown 11 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 135 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 40 17%
Sports and Recreations 13 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 3%
Psychology 6 2%
Other 22 9%
Unknown 18 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#835,337
of 13,698,878 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#166
of 2,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,194
of 210,396 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,698,878 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,704 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,396 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them