@drdevangm And ambiguous - no? https://t.co/ktrU7ewCP7
It's nice to see that @DanGraur and my 2011 proposal for choosing forward strands is used by Ensembl. https://t.co/pCuPEl0YX8 https://t.co/fDyqURWf6J
@nobolly That's a good question - and maybe we should reconsider referring to the Watson and Crick strands of DNA ... https://t.co/rvXUtXhYaY
@surt_lab @JeffreyMaloy @Ilovepigenetics forgive the bump in but assume you've seen this from Cartwright and Gaur https://t.co/cwxO6fSQA7 pax
RT @Mochimasa: DNAの二本鎖のそれぞれをWatson chain、Click chainと呼ぶことがあるらしい。個人的には、昔はそんな言い方しなかったのに、と思ったが、1967年が初出らしい。https://t.co/2b7qv2urPd
DNAの二本鎖のそれぞれをWatson chain、Click chainと呼ぶことがあるらしい。個人的には、昔はそんな言い方しなかったのに、と思ったが、1967年が初出らしい。https://t.co/2b7qv2urPd
An enjoyable paper on nomenclature ("nomenclature" and "enjoyable" in the same phrase is rare). http://t.co/X7cOxBqDvP
なるほど、5'側に染色体の短腕があるほうがWatson鎖やねんな... / “The multiple personalities of Watson an - PubMed Mobile” http://t.co/EH2NiBA6
RT @wakuteka: なるほど、5'側に染色体の短腕があるほうがWatson鎖やねんな... / “The multiple personalities of Watson an - PubMed Mobile” http://t.co/EH2NiBA6
なるほど、5'側に染色体の短腕があるほうがWatson鎖やねんな... / “The multiple personalities of Watson an - PubMed Mobile” http://t.co/EH2NiBA6
RT @thisischristina: The complicated history of the Watson and Crick strand terminology http://t.co/uhYJ3E2C via @sarahzhang
The complicated history of the Watson and Crick strand terminology http://t.co/uhYJ3E2C via @sarahzhang
I've always been confused by the orientation of genomic sequences. Glad to see I am not alone. http://t.co/Cp80txHV