| Title |
Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-39 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thierry Defechereux, Francesco Paolucci, Andrew Mirelman, Sitaporn Youngkong, Grete Botten, Terje P Hagen, Louis W Niessen |
| Abstract |
Priority setting in population health is increasingly based on explicitly formulated values. The Patients Rights Act of the Norwegian tax-based health service guaranties all citizens health care in case of a severe illness, a proven health benefit, and proportionality between need and treatment. This study compares the values of the country's health policy makers with these three official principles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 118 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
| Researcher | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 20% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 20 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2012.
All research outputs
#14,724,943
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,326
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,315
of 250,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#43
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,712 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.