↓ Skip to main content

Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Health care priority setting in Norway a multicriteria decision analysis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thierry Defechereux, Francesco Paolucci, Andrew Mirelman, Sitaporn Youngkong, Grete Botten, Terje P Hagen, Louis W Niessen

Abstract

Priority setting in population health is increasingly based on explicitly formulated values. The Patients Rights Act of the Norwegian tax-based health service guaranties all citizens health care in case of a severe illness, a proven health benefit, and proportionality between need and treatment. This study compares the values of the country's health policy makers with these three official principles.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 3 3%
Brazil 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ecuador 1 1%
Bangladesh 1 1%
Unknown 82 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 20%
Student > Master 16 17%
Researcher 11 12%
Professor 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 22 24%
Unknown 11 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 20%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 15%
Engineering 9 10%
Social Sciences 9 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 6%
Other 23 25%
Unknown 13 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2012.
All research outputs
#7,459,009
of 12,372,945 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,756
of 4,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,070
of 116,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#12
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,372,945 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,083 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.