↓ Skip to main content

Changing medical students’ attitudes to and knowledge of deafness: a mixed methods study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Changing medical students’ attitudes to and knowledge of deafness: a mixed methods study
Published in
BMC Medical Education, June 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12909-019-1666-z
Authors

Michelle Gilmore, Anna Sturgeon, Clare Thomson, David Bell, Sophie Ryan, James Bailey, Kieran McGlade, Jayne V. Woodside

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Student > Postgraduate 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 40%
Neuroscience 1 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#10,680,000
of 14,050,946 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,572
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,273
of 255,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,050,946 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them