↓ Skip to main content

Misleading about MBT in Oslo

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
Title
Misleading about MBT in Oslo
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12888-019-2193-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sigmund Karterud, Elfrida Hartveit Kvarstein

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 9 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 56%
Researcher 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Unknown 2 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 5 56%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 22%
Unknown 2 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2019.
All research outputs
#18,024,509
of 23,151,828 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#3,768
of 4,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#243,683
of 348,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#63
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,151,828 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.