↓ Skip to main content

Regional data exchange to improve care for veterans after non-VA hospitalization: a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Regional data exchange to improve care for veterans after non-VA hospitalization: a randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12911-019-0849-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian E. Dixon, Ashley L. Schwartzkopf, Vivian M. Guerrero, Justine May, Nicholas S. Koufacos, Andrew M. Bean, Joan D. Penrod, Cathy C. Schubert, Kenneth S. Boockvar

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 August 2019.
All research outputs
#4,162,252
of 13,851,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#507
of 1,258 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,234
of 253,173 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,851,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,258 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,173 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them