↓ Skip to main content

Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Research Integrity and Peer Review, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
29 tweeters
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
Title
Professional medical writing support and the quality, ethics and timeliness of clinical trial reporting: a systematic review
Published in
Research Integrity and Peer Review, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s41073-019-0073-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Obaro Evuarherhe, William Gattrell, Richard White, Christopher C. Winchester

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 2 67%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#634,104
of 13,630,308 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#36
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,516
of 248,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,630,308 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 248,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them