RT @ProfDavidGough: The taxonomy is a great initiative. My colleagues @EPPI joked (about 15 years ago) about the number of types of systema…
The taxonomy is a great initiative. My colleagues @EPPI joked (about 15 years ago) about the number of types of systematic similar Heinz's "57 Varieties"! Since then the number of types exploded. We responded with: https://t.co/lRZFPtuxoC Breadth, depth an
And we updated the paper in 2019: https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J
I see systematic maps as a stand alone product or as a stage (even if implicit) on the way to a synthesis. Both as a form of systematic review: https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And in case of interest there is also this open access paper which is more recent and broader in outlook: https://t.co/…
I had that exact conversation last week with a foundation. They called up to ask if they could hire us to do some #research. I said "does that research already exist? Is the answer already known?". They didn't know so have now gone off to find out. 🧐
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
RT @ProfDavidGough: And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the…
And before you undertake any new primary research (or make any decision informed by research) you need to know what the current evidence base is (through systematic synthesis of the evidence). https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J
RT @ProfDavidGough: And in case of interest there is also this open access paper which is more recent and broader in outlook: https://t.co/…
And in case of interest there is also this open access paper which is more recent and broader in outlook: https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks Mel. And also 'Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems' https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J and t…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks Mel. And also 'Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems' https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J and t…
Thanks Mel. And also 'Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems' https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J and the 'Science of Using Science': https://t.co/Pru5gm3u9n https://t.co/xnnbfGFv7s
RT @ProfDavidGough: Great quote from E.O. Wilson by @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance at CASE lecture last night #caselecture. 'The wor…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Great quote from E.O. Wilson by @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance at CASE lecture last night #caselecture. 'The wor…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Great quote from E.O. Wilson by @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance at CASE lecture last night #caselecture. 'The wor…
注目です。
RT @ProfDavidGough: Great quote from E.O. Wilson by @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance at CASE lecture last night #caselecture. 'The wor…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Great quote from E.O. Wilson by @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance at CASE lecture last night #caselecture. 'The wor…
Great quote from E.O. Wilson by @uksciencechief Sir Patrick Vallance at CASE lecture last night #caselecture. 'The world henceforth will be run by synthesizers' of evidence! I agree: https://t.co/zFjnNpOO9J https://t.co/WA8SZM6OoA
RT @ProfDavidGough: Systematic mapping of a research field (what has/has not been studied - & how) is a form of clustering of studies (@EPP…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Systematic mapping of a research field (what has/has not been studied - & how) is a form of clustering of studies (@EPP…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Systematic mapping of a research field (what has/has not been studied - & how) is a form of clustering of studies (@EPP…
Systematic mapping of a research field (what has/has not been studied - & how) is a form of clustering of studies (@EPPICentre since 1996). Now using AI for this in the upstream curation of studies (p11 of https://t.co/gyMSqUXfqJ) @EPPIReviewer @James_
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @matt_westmore: The @evbres posse will be interested in this https://t.co/4iSydHCenu
RT @matt_westmore: The @evbres posse will be interested in this https://t.co/4iSydHCenu
RT @ProfDavidGough: Not sure I agree. Systematic reviews (both maps & syntheses) can create new units of analysis so could (according to th…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Not sure I agree. Systematic reviews (both maps & syntheses) can create new units of analysis so could (according to th…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Not sure I agree. Systematic reviews (both maps & syntheses) can create new units of analysis so could (according to th…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Not sure I agree. Systematic reviews (both maps & syntheses) can create new units of analysis so could (according to th…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Not sure I agree. Systematic reviews (both maps & syntheses) can create new units of analysis so could (according to th…
Not sure I agree. Systematic reviews (both maps & syntheses) can create new units of analysis so could (according to this paper) be termed primary research(!) For me, secondary is reanalysis of data OR a study of studies (meta) within an evidence ecosy
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks @NazlinBhimani The #systematicreviews introductory guide @ClaireStansf @mukdarutbangpan was informed by the work…
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
An interesting consideration of the dynamic contexts, or ‘evidence ecosystems’, within which reviews are undertaken #medlibs #evidencebased
If you're confused about the differences between different types of reviews, such as 'rapid reviews' and 'living reviews', this might help: https://t.co/ngaeRjjkaz https://t.co/CJD4oU2Apu
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
RT @fjjms: Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET https://t.co/pnpb…
Lectura muy recomendable para los investigadores que deseen enviar una revisión sistemática a @EMERGENCIAS_NET
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks @NazlinBhimani The #systematicreviews introductory guide @ClaireStansf @mukdarutbangpan was informed by the work…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks @NazlinBhimani The #systematicreviews introductory guide @ClaireStansf @mukdarutbangpan was informed by the work…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks @NazlinBhimani The #systematicreviews introductory guide @ClaireStansf @mukdarutbangpan was informed by the work…
RT @ProfDavidGough: Thanks @NazlinBhimani The #systematicreviews introductory guide @ClaireStansf @mukdarutbangpan was informed by the work…
Thanks @NazlinBhimani The #systematicreviews introductory guide @ClaireStansf @mukdarutbangpan was informed by the work of @EPPICentre @profsandyoliver @James_M_Thomas. More detail at: https://t.co/IpGicTfsAv or https://t.co/r6jtDc8Pg3 and https://t.co/gyM
Are you unsure about the differences between different types of reviews? (Such as 'rapid reviews' and 'living reviews'). This might help: https://t.co/J3krrTMQ1m https://t.co/MlHHbMjNVu
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @Ginny_Brunton: @ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver Great to see this has been updated for the evidence ecosystem: Clarifyi…
@ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver Great to see this has been updated for the evidence ecosystem: Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within evidence ecosystems @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver Available at: (link
If you're confused about the differences between different types of reviews, such as 'rapid reviews' and 'living reviews', this might help: https://t.co/CRuctRcH8k https://t.co/Uki4vdgN3M
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems @ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver http…
Confused by which type of #Literature review. This might come in handy.... or not....
Very informative in-depth analysis 👇. https://t.co/53cTzoJqBn
RT @matt_westmore: The @evbres posse will be interested in this https://t.co/4iSydHCenu
RT @matt_westmore: The @evbres posse will be interested in this https://t.co/4iSydHCenu
RT @matt_westmore: The @evbres posse will be interested in this https://t.co/4iSydHCenu
RT @Students4BE: Interesting article clarifying differences between types of reviews (including rapid reviews, living reviews) within an ev…
Interesting article clarifying differences between types of reviews (including rapid reviews, living reviews) within an evidence ecosystem that embraces innovative automation of particular review methods. https://t.co/J3krrTMQ1m
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems @ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver http…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems @ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver http…
RT @GlobalPHObserv: Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems @ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver http…
Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems @ProfDavidGough @James_M_Thomas @profsandyoliver https://t.co/mJhpqWkFfS
RT @EllaFlemyng: Very excited to see this update from @ProfDavidGough, @James_M_Thomas & @profsandyoliver on their #SysRevJ Commentary from…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
Confused about the differences between different types of reviews? (Such as 'rapid reviews' and 'living reviews'). This might help: https://t.co/J3krrTMQ1m https://t.co/0WCYOz4dVW
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @James_M_Thomas: Understanding emerging methodological diversity in review practice in terms of interactions between different actors in…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @James_M_Thomas: Understanding emerging methodological diversity in review practice in terms of interactions between different actors in…
RT @uct_hsl: Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems https://t.co/LHp60EVG8w #sysrevsj
The @evbres posse will be interested in this
RT @DrSarahEJackson: A (peer-reviewed?) review of reviews ⬇️ #academia #systematicreview #rapidreview #livingreview #umbrellareview #allth…
Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems https://t.co/mZFi49VcUn #systematicreviews #typology @cochranemthds
RT @FalmerLib: Interesting article @BrightonNurses https://t.co/dAWrjgCraZ
RT @James_M_Thomas: Understanding emerging methodological diversity in review practice in terms of interactions between different actors in…
Interesting article @BrightonNurses
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…
RT @James_M_Thomas: Understanding emerging methodological diversity in review practice in terms of interactions between different actors in…
RT @EllaFlemyng: Very excited to see this update from @ProfDavidGough, @James_M_Thomas & @profsandyoliver on their #SysRevJ Commentary from…
RT @James_M_Thomas: Understanding emerging methodological diversity in review practice in terms of interactions between different actors in…
RT @James_M_Thomas: Understanding emerging methodological diversity in review practice in terms of interactions between different actors in…
RT @ProfDavidGough: We have updated our 2012 (60K+hits) paper on Clarifying differences between review methods and contextualized within ev…