| Title |
Clarifying differences between reviews within evidence ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-019-1089-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David Gough, James Thomas, Sandy Oliver |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 89 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 26 | 29% |
| Canada | 8 | 9% |
| Spain | 4 | 4% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Ireland | 3 | 3% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 39% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 53% |
| Scientists | 24 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 148 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 24% |
| Unknown | 42 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 19 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 30% |
| Unknown | 44 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2023.
All research outputs
#710,307
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#81
of 2,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,847
of 361,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#4
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.