↓ Skip to main content

Health professions digital education on clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review by Digital Health Education collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Health professions digital education on clinical practice guidelines: a systematic review by Digital Health Education collaboration
Published in
BMC Medicine, July 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12916-019-1370-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lorainne Tudor Car, Aijia Soong, Bhone Myint Kyaw, Kee Leng Chua, Naomi Low-Beer, Azeem Majeed

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 24%
Unspecified 2 12%
Student > Master 2 12%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 5 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Unspecified 2 12%
Engineering 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 41%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,479,108
of 14,021,570 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#1,359
of 2,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,750
of 250,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,021,570 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them