↓ Skip to main content

Lessons learned from the development and implementation of a patient-reported outcome and experience measure (POEM) in an Australian glaucoma practice

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ophthalmology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
Lessons learned from the development and implementation of a patient-reported outcome and experience measure (POEM) in an Australian glaucoma practice
Published in
BMC Ophthalmology, August 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12886-019-1198-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alison Fraenkel, Graham A. Lee, Stephen J Vincent, Roslyn A. Vincent, Rupert R. A. Bourne, Peter Shah

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 50%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,884,282
of 13,560,201 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ophthalmology
#119
of 814 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,185
of 199,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,560,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 814 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them