| Title |
Evaluating the acceptability of a co-produced and co-delivered mental health public engagement festival: Mental Health Matters, Jakarta, Indonesia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-019-0161-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helen Brooks, Irmansyah Irmansyah, Herni Susanti, Bagus Utomo, Benny Prawira, Livia Iskandar, Erminia Colucci, Budi-Anna Keliat, Karen James, Penny Bee, Vicky Bell, Karina Lovell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 11 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 8% |
| Sri Lanka | 2 | 4% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 2% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 31 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 47 | 90% |
| Scientists | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 10% |
| Researcher | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 11% |
| Unknown | 45 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 12 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 47 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#987,814
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#68
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,528
of 352,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,008 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.