↓ Skip to main content

Comparative outcomes of foot cast and short leg cast in pseudo-Jones avulsion fracture: a single blinded randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
Title
Comparative outcomes of foot cast and short leg cast in pseudo-Jones avulsion fracture: a single blinded randomized controlled trial
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, September 2019
DOI 10.1186/s13047-019-0359-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peerapong Piyapittayanun, Kanakij Mutthakalin, Alisara Arirachakaran, Jatupon Kongtharvonskul

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,116,986
of 13,645,153 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#198
of 546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,469
of 227,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,645,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.