Title |
Protocol for a randomised controlled trial examining the impact of a web-based personally controlled health management system on the uptake of influenza vaccination rates
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-86 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Annie YS Lau, Vitali Sintchenko, Jacinta Crimmins, Farah Magrabi, Blanca Gallego, Enrico Coiera |
Abstract |
Online social networking and personally controlled health management systems (PCHMS) offer a new opportunity for developing innovative interventions to prevent diseases of public health concern (e.g., influenza) but there are few comparative studies about patterns of use and impact of these systems. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 167 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 29 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 15% |
Student > Master | 25 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
Other | 31 | 18% |
Unknown | 34 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 26% |
Psychology | 22 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 4% |
Other | 28 | 16% |
Unknown | 44 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2012.
All research outputs
#15,242,847
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,522
of 7,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,327
of 160,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#48
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.