Title |
An investigation of factors associated with the health and well-being of HIV-infected or HIV-affected older people in rural South Africa
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-259 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Makandwe Nyirenda, Somnath Chatterji, Jane Falkingham, Portia Mutevedzi, Victoria Hosegood, Maria Evandrou, Paul Kowal, Marie-Louise Newell |
Abstract |
Despite the severe impact of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, the health of older people aged 50+ is often overlooked owing to the dearth of data on the direct and indirect effects of HIV on older people's health status and well-being. The aim of this study was to examine correlates of health and well-being of HIV-infected older people relative to HIV-affected people in rural South Africa, defined as participants with an HIV-infected or death of an adult child due to HIV-related cause. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 168 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 17% |
Student > Master | 26 | 15% |
Researcher | 21 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 18 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 20% |
Unknown | 34 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 40 | 23% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 19% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 13% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Psychology | 6 | 3% |
Other | 26 | 15% |
Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 April 2012.
All research outputs
#18,305,445
of 22,664,267 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#12,753
of 14,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,147
of 160,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#154
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,267 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.